【Article】理性的評価の何が悪い？(2) What's the matter with Matter? (2)

【雑誌記事】アイザック，セバスチャン．2005．「理性的評価の何が悪い？」．『モナッシュ・ディベーティング・レビュー』．4巻．44-46頁．モナッシュ・アソシエーション・オブ・ディベーターズ

ケビンのものと同じく、オーマーの記事への反論記事。
感性的評価なんてくそくらえ、という大変分かりやすいロゴス万歳論。

【Article】Isaac, Sebastian. 2005. What's the matter with Matter?. Monash Debating Review. Vol.4 pp.44-46. Melbourne: Monash Association of Debaters.

Another rebuttal article to Omar's in 2003. It says Manner based adjudication is lazy and Matter should be the main factor.

--------------------------------
The credibility of debating as a discipline turns on its ability to have meaningful judging. Without it, results don’t tell us anything and tournaments don’t mean anything. So every time someone tells me of a round that they have judged and says that manner was the decisive factor, it makes me cry a little inside.
-----------------------------------------